���These calculations all point to the same general conclusion. The first half of 2004 should be bullish although not as strong as the last 9 months of 2003. A top should develop around 1178 and be followed by a substantial break of 120-180 S&P points and this break will probably end in the fall of 2004. After that low a fast advance lasting 7 to 8 months should culminate at the peak of the domed house and a bull market top around 1340 in 2005.���
After the 3 peaks in 2004, the market bottomed at 1060 in August 2004. 7 months later was the top in March 2005 (domed house). Why are you now saying that the March top was a minor house as opposed to the final domed house for this bull market? Thanks for replying.
2 comments:
Since you had the three peaks in 2004 between Feb and June, why isn' the domed housed occurring in 2005 the end of whole bull move from 2003-2005?
From your January 5, 2004 forecast:
���These calculations all point to the same general conclusion. The first half of 2004 should be bullish although not as strong as the last 9 months of 2003. A top should develop around 1178 and be followed by a substantial break of 120-180 S&P points and this break will probably end in the fall of 2004. After that low a fast advance lasting 7 to 8 months should culminate at the peak of the domed house and a bull market top around 1340 in 2005.���
After the 3 peaks in 2004, the market bottomed at 1060 in August 2004. 7 months later was the top in March 2005 (domed house). Why are you now saying that the March top was a minor house as opposed to the final domed house for this bull market?
Thanks for replying.
Post a Comment